![]() ![]() I have no Shimano battery, but thanks to the pictures of Chicken4later and considering the tensions I measure on the output pins, one is probably the battery Rx signal (3.3V powered, no battery) and the other one Tx (0V powered, no battery). There is also an adapter (SM-BTE60) which uses only 2 of the 3 communication wires. The output connector has 2 power pins (+/-) plus another 3. I have the opposite problem on the same system: I've got a Shimano STePS EC-E6000 charger (rated output 40 V 4.4 A / 42 V 4A) that I would like to use as a fast transportable charger on a custom made ebike. If anyone has a shimano e6000 charger i would like to know how many connectors are on the plug There are also 2 small wires going to the connector on the battery pack so i am wondering if the original charger has to communicate with the BMS before allowing a charge? or are the wires only to communicate with the controller on the bike? Is my battery pack worn out from sitting too long? Any ideas on how to get this thing going would be appreciated. my charger is rated for 2 amps and the factory charger is 4 amps ![]() Then I went back to charging from the connector on the outside of the pack and still noting. The pack started off at 18.6 volts and i charged it directly for about 10 min and the voltage rose to 33.2v. reading online I found that some BMSs wont charge the cells if they drop below a certain voltage, so i charged the cells directly for a few minutes. The BMS is not passing the voltage from the charger to the cells. When I plug the charger into the pack it wont charge the battery. Since the correct charger is over 100 dollars i decided to go ahead and buy a generic 36v lithium battery charger and try to make it work. The battery is model number BT-E6000, it has 40 18650 cells in 10 groups of 4 for 36v total I believe the bike has been sitting for about one year with a dead battery. Maybe swapping out the crunchy options for a couple more acoustic models would have made it even more useful, but this remains an appealing six-string multi-tool and a genuine problem-solver for many gigging players.Hello all, I just picked up an IZIP e3 path plus second hand for very cheap. “The launch of the Acoustasonic Player Telecaster feels like a no-brainer move for Fender, spreading the potential appeal of what is virtually a whole new category of guitar. The feel of the bevelled arm rest and fingerboard edges says quality and comfort this is an inviting guitar and that Modern Deep-C neck will feel familiar to anyone who has played the electric Player series models.” A lovely dark rosewood fingerboard and bridge replaces the US version’s ebony, but that’s not anissue for us. “In terms of feel and build, we honestly can’t find a compromise between this Ensenada-made Player and the US Acoustasonics we’ve tried. MusicRadar: The onboard voice options might have been scaled down but the Acoustasonic Telecaster sticks the landing as a Player Series model, in what could be one of the guitars to make the hybrid build truly go mainstream.įender Player Series Acoustasonic Telecaster: The web says That, in sum, is the sort of thing the Acoustasonic format encourages. That said, it can be pressed into service of many different kinds of styles, perhaps some that are all your own. It is warmer, with a little more width than you’d expect from a Tele’s bridge pickup. Fender promises twang but this isn’t Pete Anderson levels of twang. Park yourself on position one for a more traditional electric guitar experience, but don’t necessarily expect a traditional Telecaster experience. In a sense, this is a sound that almost exists outside of the spectrum of acoustic/electric tones, and is sure to support pedalboard experimentation. The sound is just coming from the piezo and as you turn the blend control it adds drive. ![]() Here is where the true hybrid tones are, and as such, there are fewer references for what we are hearing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |